Given that several geographic factors have a substantial impact on income levels and growth, this essay discusses the significant relationship among the geographic location and economic growth. Furthermore, it appears that geography affects the decision of economic policy itself. Many of the geographical places where modern economic growth is impossible have been found to have high population densities and rapid population growth. Communities in remote locations, for instance, as well as those in tropical regions where diseases are more common, must pay significant travel costs for international trade. The geography of economic activity is another term for the distribution of people, production and consumption of goods and services across a territory.
Geographical position could be seen as a gift that confers strength and bliss on the owner, but it can also contribute to conflict in international relations. Geographical influences on the acquisition of economic power are particularly significant. The development of the economy is effected by a number of elements, including the availability of arable land, navigable rivers, ports, the possibility of communication between different regions and others. As was the case with Africa, geographic “poor” can also have detrimental effects on development (economic, social and cultural). In fact, it is argued that the poor horizontal fragmentation of the African continent, with the absence of many significant ports, was one of the causes of underdevelopment and cultural, economic, and technological backwardness because it denied the continent the opportunity to communicate with the outside world and foster trade.
Geographical location is one of the most crucial development elements since it significantly affects access to markets. The foundation of every great empire has been trade routes, and these are nearly usually marine. There are major exceptions such as, the Mongol empire of the Middle Ages that was centered on the Silk Road that connected China to the West. Through tolls and shipping services, ports can generate revenue. Not only do the countries lose out on these services if they do not have access to the ocean, but also they have to move everything by land, which is far more expensive. Access to ports is an issue for countries like Afghanistan, Rwanda, Malawi, or Bolivia. Other countries, such as Ethiopia or Lesotho, are not only landlocked, but mountainous as well, making trade even more expensive.
Since the dawn of civilization, geographical location has had an impact on the development of the countries. Years ago, biogeographical factors produced a unique path for development. A few certain areas with favorable conditions were the first to develop sedentary agriculture and farming, giving them an advantage in the creation of classes that did not produce food, specialization and the accumulation of wealth. Climate, latitude and landmass were among the identified characteristics that favored biodiversity in terms of domesticated plants and animals. The dissemination of information and skills was also aided by geographical circumstances, with Eurasia being particularly favored in this regard. It is believed that differences in original circumstances ( going back to the Neolithic Revolution’s beginning ) still exist now because they persisted through time due to urban agglomeration effects and/ or colonisation.
Moreover, a nation’s place on the international stage as well as the development of its relationships with neighboring nations are significantly influenced by its geographic location and configuration. For instance, it depends whether a nation is insular or continental, low-lying or incredibly dispersed on both a horizontal and vertical axis. A country’s proximity to conflict zones, ethnic conflicts, major countries’ strategic interests, as well as its own possession of critical raw commodities or key strategic locations, are all important factors ( ports, airports, sea straits, etc). Other significant power factors include proximity to or control over major sea lanes and key aspects.
Some states are more exposure to the risk of being conquered by other countries due to their geographic location. From a strategic perspective, certain governments have positions that are more significant geographically than others. The country’s foreign policy is seen to be influenced by its access to the main sea lanes and the degree to which the shape of its boundaries exposes it to or shields it from the possibility of assault by nearby enemies. Furthermore, a country’s ability to mobilize its armies against other countries depends on its geographic location, which also affects climate and the duration of the growing season for agricultural items. The type and scope of threats and challenges to a state’s security are determined by their geographic position in conjunction with the kind of regional structure they are required to operate within, especially in the case of tiny states. A minor state’s political future is typically determined by its geographic location and interactions with major powers.
It is worthy to be mentioned that except from geographical location, climate, natural resources and environmental stability have a significant role to the development of countries. The fact that the poorest nations are located in the tropics, where it is hot, the soil is less fruitful, the water is more scarce and where diseases thrive, is not a coincidence. On the other hand, the vast expanses of extremely productive land, the moderate climate and abundant rainfall benefit Europe and North America. In addition, gold, diamonds and oil have also contributed to South Africa’s development of the continent’s most prosperous economy. Finally, it could not be disputed that certain nations have more stable environmental conditions than others, such as Bangladesh and the Philippines, or in Madagascar, where the annual cyclone season regularly ruins bridges and roads, harms railroads and refineries, and destroys residences and accommodations near the coast.
Due to its unique geostrategic worth, which makes it beneficial for supporting the strategic interests and aspirations of the big powers in the wider region, Cyprus has faced considerable issues of conflicts and conquests for decades or even centuries. For military troops conducting operations in Asia Minor, the Middle East, North Africa and the Central Mediterranean, in particular, Cyprus serves as a sea and air transport zone. In addition to serving as a supply facility for naval and air forces operating in the Eastern Mediterranean, it also serves as an air bridge intermediate station for the transportation of troops, supplies and equipment from Europe to the Middle East and North Africa. It might also serves as a staging area for forces or health losses that arrive from Asia Minor, the Middle East, or the larger region of the Indian Ocean in order to reassemble and depart or return to the west.
In addition, in the Balkan region, the country of Greece is, from a geographical point of view, in a privileged position compared to its northern neighbors. Geography motivates the formulation of the external policy of the country, exploits its advantages, builds the relationships of mutually beneficial cooperation, but at the same time emerges crises. Greece’s geographic location at the southernmost tip of the Old continent, enables it to benefit from the multifaceted power that comes with being close to the Balkan countries, the Middle East and Africa, as well as the waters of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Libyan Sea. It is, in general, the exit of the Balkan peninsula to the Mediterranean (warm seas), with the ports of North Greece, such as the port of Thessaloniki, to be characterized as the ports of the whole Balkans.
All these elements provide Greece and Cyprus with advantages and possibilities of influencing the surrounding area and exercising a foreign policy, with initiatives in the field of economy, trade, business, education, and culture.
It is certain that technological developments in the fields of transport, communications, space and warfare limit or change the factor of geography. It is, for example, obvious that the Alps were a different value obstacle during the Roman Empire than they were during the Second World War. Likewise, the strategic value of the Strait of Gibraltar has changed from what it was in previous centuries or even a few decades ago. Undoubtedly, this differentiation is more pronounced in the modern era, due to the use of high-tech systems. The control of navigation can now be occurred by satellite systems or radar, from long distances and with absolute precision and attacking sea targets – if required – can be achieved from distances of kilometers, with high precision missile systems that can be launched from bases land, by ships or by aircraft.
[1] Geography and Economic Development [CID Working Paper No. 1
March 1999]
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/search?query=publications&advanced=&fq=&page=1
[2] Climate Change Is a Challenge For Sustainable Development
https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/speech/2014/01/15/climate-change-is-challenge-for-sustainable-development
[3] The Economic Significance Of Natural Resources
https://www.oecd.org/general/searchresults/?q=geographic%20location&cx=012432601748511391518:xzeadub0b0a&cof=FORID:11&ie=UTF-8
[4] Strategy for the Western Balkans: EU sets out new flagship initiatives and support for the reform-driven region
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_561
[5] Why geopolitical risk management is a strategic opportunity
https://www.ey.com/en_gl/geostrategy/why-geopolitical-risk-management-is-an-opportunity